Miguel

Origin	Gender	Meaning

Popularity of Miguel

Year	Rank	Gender	% of Total Gender
2020	188	Male	0.1110%
2019	178	Male	0.1138%
2018	179	Male	0.1125%
2017	176	Male	0.1152%
2016	162	Male	0.1240%
2015	160	Male	0.1259%
2014	147	Male	0.1346%
2013	134	Male	0.1431%
2012	130	Male	0.1451%
2011	126	Male	0.1563%
2010	113	Male	0.1688%
2009	99	Male	0.1975%
2008	101	Male	0.2042%
2007	94	Male	0.2214%
2006	89	Male	0.2236%
2005	93	Male	0.2199%
2004	97	Male	0.2139%
2003	95	Male	0.2186%
2002	89	Male	0.2248%
2001	88	Male	0.2203%
2000	86	Male	0.2237%
1999	91	Male	0.2062%
1998	90	Male	0.2100%
1997	91	Male	0.2121%
1996	91	Male	0.2077%
1995	94	Male	0.1965%
1994	94	Male	0.1978%
1993	88	Male	0.2103%
1992	90	Male	0.1987%
1991	92	Male	0.1860%
1990	100	Male	0.1717%
1989	108	Male	0.1469%
1988	111	Male	0.1362%
1987	110	Male	0.1353%
1986	111	Male	0.1339%
1985	113	Male	0.1311%
1984	113	Male	0.1289%
1983	114	Male	0.1277%
1982	110	Male	0.1392%
1981	116	Male	0.1283%
1980	128	Male	0.1172%
1979	137	Male	0.1093%
1978	145	Male	0.1067%
1977	145	Male	0.1026%
1976	143	Male	0.1075%
1975	148	Male	0.1023%
1974	147	Male	0.1018%
1973	163	Male	0.0903%
1972	175	Male	0.0849%
1971	181	Male	0.0808%
1970	197	Male	0.0707%
1969	198	Male	0.0712%
1968	212	Male	0.0622%
1967	216	Male	0.0592%
1966	220	Male	0.0559%
1965	238	Male	0.0502%
1964	249	Male	0.0467%
1963	260	Male	0.0428%
1962	259	Male	0.0413%
1961	274	Male	0.0380%
1960	279	Male	0.0382%
1959	281	Male	0.0365%
1958	274	Male	0.0359%
1957	279	Male	0.0338%
1956	284	Male	0.0313%
1955	291	Male	0.0290%
1954	288	Male	0.0293%
1953	304	Male	0.0272%
1952	314	Male	0.0261%
1951	322	Male	0.0240%
1950	322	Male	0.0247%
1949	352	Male	0.0204%
1948	344	Male	0.0215%
1947	400	Male	0.0159%
1946	400	Male	0.0157%
1945	396	Male	0.0168%
1944	409	Male	0.0156%
1943	424	Male	0.0147%
1942	456	Male	0.0130%
1941	459	Male	0.0132%
1940	446	Male	0.0143%
1939	455	Male	0.0142%
1938	493	Male	0.0122%
1937	473	Male	0.0132%
1936	455	Male	0.0144%
1935	473	Male	0.0135%
1934	456	Male	0.0144%
1933	403	Male	0.0176%
1932	427	Male	0.0158%
1931	407	Male	0.0178%
1930	385	Male	0.0195%
1929	367	Male	0.0220%
1928	399	Male	0.0198%
1927	428	Male	0.0173%
1926	434	Male	0.0170%
1925	429	Male	0.0166%
1924	442	Male	0.0163%
1923	464	Male	0.0155%
1922	483	Male	0.0144%
1921	553	Male	0.0113%
1920	547	Male	0.0115%
1919	509	Male	0.0135%
1918	611	Male	0.0097%
1917	573	Male	0.0112%
1916	619	Male	0.0096%
1915	554	Male	0.0118%
1914	613	Male	0.0100%
1913	557	Male	0.0114%
1912	597	Male	0.0104%
1911	493	Male	0.0149%
1910	497	Male	0.0153%
1909	647	Male	0.0102%
1908	519	Male	0.0144%
1907	580	Male	0.0120%
1906	536	Male	0.0132%
1905	444	Male	0.0175%
1904	529	Male	0.0130%
1903	515	Male	0.0139%
1902	469	Male	0.0158%
1901	579	Male	0.0112%
1900	617	Male	0.0105%
1899	539	Male	0.0122%
1898	623	Male	0.0098%
1897	573	Male	0.0115%
1896	948	Male	0.0054%
1895	519	Male	0.0126%
1894	586	Male	0.0104%
1893	598	Male	0.0099%
1892	509	Male	0.0122%
1891	817	Male	0.0064%
1890	717	Male	0.0075%
1889	765	Male	0.0067%
1886	531	Male	0.0109%
1885	627	Male	0.0086%
1884	687	Male	0.0073%
1883	548	Male	0.0107%
1882	631	Male	0.0082%
1881	632	Male	0.0083%
1880	551	Male	0.0101%