Leigh
| Origin | Gender | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| English | Either | Meadow |
| Old English | Boy | A meadow or clearing. A boy or girl's name. |
| Old English | Girl | A meadow or clearing. A boy or girl's name. |
| Caymanian | Either | Meadow |
Fun Facts about the name Leigh
Popularity of Leigh
Popularity Analysis
The name Leigh first appeared in the social security administration database in 1885. Its highest recorded popularity was in 1969 when it reached rank #202. As of 1996, it ranked #899.
| Year | Rank | Gender | % of Total Gender |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 899 | Female | 0.0114% |
| 1995 | 850 | Female | 0.0120% |
| 1994 | 726 | Female | 0.0147% |
| 1993 | 617 | Female | 0.0188% |
| 1992 | 556 | Female | 0.0212% |
| 1991 | 526 | Female | 0.0219% |
| 1990 | 469 | Female | 0.0254% |
| 1989 | 409 | Female | 0.0303% |
| 1988 | 346 | Female | 0.0372% |
| 1987 | 357 | Female | 0.0356% |
| 1986 | 337 | Female | 0.0389% |
| 1985 | 312 | Female | 0.0419% |
| 1984 | 271 | Female | 0.0490% |
| 1983 | 271 | Female | 0.0483% |
| 1982 | 258 | Female | 0.0528% |
| 1981 | 230 | Female | 0.0614% |
| 1980 | 218 | Female | 0.0662% |
| 1979 | 232 | Female | 0.0654% |
| 1978 | 258 | Female | 0.0557% |
| 1977 | 258 | Female | 0.0580% |
| 1976 | 256 | Female | 0.0592% |
| 1975 | 228 | Female | 0.0682% |
| 1974 | 206 | Female | 0.0782% |
| 1973 | 239 | Female | 0.0694% |
| 1972 | 229 | Female | 0.0750% |
| 1971 | 950 | Male | 0.0041% |
| 1971 | 213 | Female | 0.0813% |
| 1970 | 863 | Male | 0.0046% |
| 1970 | 213 | Female | 0.0810% |
| 1969 | 202 | Female | 0.0887% |
| 1969 | 875 | Male | 0.0042% |
| 1968 | 210 | Female | 0.0834% |
| 1968 | 818 | Male | 0.0046% |
| 1967 | 218 | Female | 0.0784% |
| 1967 | 779 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1966 | 266 | Female | 0.0554% |
| 1966 | 865 | Male | 0.0039% |
| 1965 | 951 | Male | 0.0032% |
| 1965 | 308 | Female | 0.0475% |
| 1964 | 872 | Male | 0.0038% |
| 1964 | 279 | Female | 0.0536% |
| 1963 | 296 | Female | 0.0494% |
| 1963 | 865 | Male | 0.0037% |
| 1962 | 314 | Female | 0.0440% |
| 1962 | 873 | Male | 0.0036% |
| 1961 | 326 | Female | 0.0405% |
| 1961 | 848 | Male | 0.0038% |
| 1960 | 856 | Male | 0.0036% |
| 1960 | 343 | Female | 0.0371% |
| 1959 | 849 | Male | 0.0037% |
| 1959 | 369 | Female | 0.0323% |
| 1958 | 366 | Female | 0.0300% |
| 1958 | 793 | Male | 0.0041% |
| 1957 | 828 | Male | 0.0038% |
| 1957 | 365 | Female | 0.0294% |
| 1956 | 742 | Male | 0.0046% |
| 1956 | 352 | Female | 0.0298% |
| 1955 | 654 | Male | 0.0060% |
| 1955 | 410 | Female | 0.0230% |
| 1954 | 497 | Female | 0.0161% |
| 1954 | 731 | Male | 0.0047% |
| 1953 | 564 | Female | 0.0125% |
| 1953 | 699 | Male | 0.0052% |
| 1952 | 699 | Male | 0.0051% |
| 1952 | 651 | Female | 0.0099% |
| 1951 | 765 | Male | 0.0044% |
| 1951 | 641 | Female | 0.0100% |
| 1950 | 659 | Female | 0.0096% |
| 1950 | 770 | Male | 0.0044% |
| 1949 | 652 | Female | 0.0093% |
| 1949 | 673 | Male | 0.0058% |
| 1948 | 693 | Male | 0.0052% |
| 1948 | 782 | Female | 0.0069% |
| 1947 | 681 | Male | 0.0056% |
| 1947 | 824 | Female | 0.0063% |
| 1946 | 707 | Male | 0.0052% |
| 1946 | 723 | Female | 0.0078% |
| 1945 | 877 | Female | 0.0055% |
| 1945 | 693 | Male | 0.0056% |
| 1944 | 792 | Male | 0.0045% |
| 1943 | 737 | Male | 0.0053% |
| 1942 | 780 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1941 | 824 | Male | 0.0048% |
| 1940 | 768 | Male | 0.0055% |
| 1939 | 986 | Male | 0.0037% |
| 1938 | 850 | Male | 0.0048% |
| 1937 | 816 | Male | 0.0052% |
| 1936 | 828 | Male | 0.0051% |
| 1935 | 949 | Male | 0.0042% |
| 1928 | 988 | Male | 0.0043% |
| 1897 | 830 | Male | 0.0066% |
| 1896 | 940 | Male | 0.0054% |
| 1895 | 838 | Male | 0.0063% |
| 1894 | 826 | Male | 0.0064% |
| 1892 | 773 | Male | 0.0068% |
| 1888 | 878 | Male | 0.0054% |
| 1887 | 880 | Male | 0.0055% |
| 1886 | 730 | Male | 0.0067% |
| 1885 | 808 | Male | 0.0060% |
Search Baby Names
Today's Poll
Loading...
