Search Baby Names
Today's Poll
Loading...
Joshua
| Origin | Gender | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Christian | Boy | God is salvation |
| Favorite | Boy | Jehovah saves |
| Hebrew | Boy | God is Salvation |
| Mormon | Boy | meaning in Hebrew is God will save |
Popularity of Joshua
| Year | Rank | Gender | % of Total Gender |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 54 | Male | 0.3235% |
| 2019 | 48 | Male | 0.3441% |
| 2018 | 40 | Male | 0.3823% |
| 2017 | 38 | Male | 0.4210% |
| 2016 | 35 | Male | 0.4549% |
| 2015 | 33 | Male | 0.4798% |
| 2014 | 25 | Male | 0.5319% |
| 2013 | 21 | Male | 0.5855% |
| 2012 | 17 | Male | 0.6243% |
| 2011 | 14 | Male | 0.6782% |
| 2010 | 11 | Male | 0.7493% |
| 2009 | 6 | Male | 0.8310% |
| 2008 | 4 | Male | 0.8798% |
| 2007 | 4 | Male | 0.9318% |
| 2006 | 3 | Male | 1.0174% |
| 2005 | 3 | Male | 1.0928% |
| 2004 | 3 | Male | 1.1452% |
| 2003 | 3 | Male | 1.1943% |
| 2002 | 3 | Male | 1.2580% |
| 2001 | 4 | Male | 1.2584% |
| 2000 | 4 | Male | 1.3193% |
| 1999 | 4 | Male | 1.3373% |
| 1998 | 4 | Male | 1.3860% |
| 1997 | 5 | Male | 1.4161% |
| 1996 | 5 | Male | 1.4566% |
| 1995 | 5 | Male | 1.5280% |
| 1994 | 4 | Male | 1.5398% |
| 1993 | 4 | Male | 1.6268% |
| 1992 | 4 | Male | 1.7260% |
| 1991 | 4 | Male | 1.9457% |
| 1990 | 4 | Male | 2.0095% |
| 1989 | 4 | Male | 2.1047% |
| 1988 | 4 | Male | 2.1321% |
| 1987 | 4 | Male | 2.0524% |
| 1986 | 4 | Male | 1.9550% |
| 1985 | 4 | Male | 2.1945% |
| 1984 | 4 | Male | 2.1467% |
| 1983 | 5 | Male | 1.9706% |
| 1982 | 7 | Male | 2.0159% |
| 1981 | 6 | Male | 2.0979% |
| 1980 | 7 | Male | 1.9455% |
| 1979 | 9 | Male | 1.7384% |
| 1978 | 12 | Male | 1.4761% |
| 1977 | 14 | Male | 1.2913% |
| 1976 | 18 | Male | 1.0327% |
| 1975 | 26 | Male | 0.8982% |
| 1974 | 29 | Male | 0.7118% |
| 1973 | 42 | Male | 0.4997% |
| 1972 | 59 | Male | 0.3010% |
| 1971 | 80 | Male | 0.2006% |
| 1970 | 150 | Male | 0.1141% |
| 1969 | 196 | Male | 0.0723% |
| 1968 | 270 | Male | 0.0414% |
| 1967 | 312 | Male | 0.0317% |
| 1966 | 341 | Male | 0.0266% |
| 1965 | 352 | Male | 0.0244% |
| 1964 | 404 | Male | 0.0193% |
| 1963 | 418 | Male | 0.0179% |
| 1962 | 435 | Male | 0.0161% |
| 1961 | 424 | Male | 0.0162% |
| 1960 | 454 | Male | 0.0146% |
| 1959 | 442 | Male | 0.0151% |
| 1958 | 477 | Male | 0.0129% |
| 1957 | 468 | Male | 0.0124% |
| 1956 | 491 | Male | 0.0111% |
| 1955 | 469 | Male | 0.0117% |
| 1954 | 531 | Male | 0.0091% |
| 1953 | 542 | Male | 0.0086% |
| 1952 | 537 | Male | 0.0088% |
| 1951 | 529 | Male | 0.0087% |
| 1950 | 536 | Male | 0.0090% |
| 1949 | 489 | Male | 0.0102% |
| 1948 | 582 | Male | 0.0074% |
| 1947 | 574 | Male | 0.0075% |
| 1946 | 607 | Male | 0.0069% |
| 1945 | 615 | Male | 0.0071% |
| 1944 | 602 | Male | 0.0075% |
| 1943 | 658 | Male | 0.0065% |
| 1942 | 586 | Male | 0.0080% |
| 1941 | 631 | Male | 0.0074% |
| 1940 | 634 | Male | 0.0075% |
| 1939 | 571 | Male | 0.0089% |
| 1938 | 722 | Male | 0.0063% |
| 1937 | 607 | Male | 0.0084% |
| 1936 | 579 | Male | 0.0094% |
| 1935 | 666 | Male | 0.0075% |
| 1934 | 574 | Male | 0.0100% |
| 1933 | 571 | Male | 0.0099% |
| 1932 | 565 | Male | 0.0102% |
| 1931 | 606 | Male | 0.0090% |
| 1930 | 647 | Male | 0.0080% |
| 1929 | 729 | Male | 0.0067% |
| 1928 | 561 | Male | 0.0104% |
| 1927 | 573 | Male | 0.0100% |
| 1926 | 620 | Male | 0.0090% |
| 1925 | 598 | Male | 0.0096% |
| 1924 | 596 | Male | 0.0098% |
| 1923 | 535 | Male | 0.0115% |
| 1922 | 576 | Male | 0.0109% |
| 1921 | 565 | Male | 0.0110% |
| 1920 | 544 | Male | 0.0116% |
| 1919 | 506 | Male | 0.0137% |
| 1918 | 550 | Male | 0.0113% |
| 1917 | 525 | Male | 0.0126% |
| 1916 | 585 | Male | 0.0107% |
| 1915 | 474 | Male | 0.0154% |
| 1914 | 530 | Male | 0.0127% |
| 1913 | 492 | Male | 0.0145% |
| 1912 | 508 | Male | 0.0133% |
| 1911 | 449 | Male | 0.0178% |
| 1910 | 401 | Male | 0.0211% |
| 1909 | 493 | Male | 0.0158% |
| 1908 | 459 | Male | 0.0174% |
| 1907 | 460 | Male | 0.0164% |
| 1906 | 427 | Male | 0.0187% |
| 1905 | 557 | Male | 0.0126% |
| 1904 | 502 | Male | 0.0137% |
| 1903 | 459 | Male | 0.0162% |
| 1902 | 530 | Male | 0.0128% |
| 1901 | 400 | Male | 0.0190% |
| 1900 | 371 | Male | 0.0222% |
| 1899 | 380 | Male | 0.0208% |
| 1898 | 299 | Male | 0.0295% |
| 1897 | 348 | Male | 0.0238% |
| 1896 | 354 | Male | 0.0232% |
| 1895 | 343 | Male | 0.0229% |
| 1894 | 383 | Male | 0.0192% |
| 1893 | 377 | Male | 0.0190% |
| 1892 | 285 | Male | 0.0312% |
| 1891 | 354 | Male | 0.0220% |
| 1890 | 365 | Male | 0.0200% |
| 1889 | 300 | Male | 0.0277% |
| 1888 | 247 | Male | 0.0385% |
| 1887 | 247 | Male | 0.0375% |
| 1886 | 229 | Male | 0.0462% |
| 1885 | 254 | Male | 0.0371% |
| 1884 | 266 | Male | 0.0334% |
| 1883 | 202 | Male | 0.0489% |
| 1882 | 236 | Male | 0.0410% |
| 1881 | 249 | Male | 0.0369% |
| 1880 | 212 | Male | 0.0481% |