Humberto
| Origin | Gender | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Brazilian | Boy | Bright giant |
| Latino | Boy | Bright warrior |
Fun Facts about the name Humberto
Popularity of Humberto
Popularity Analysis
The name Humberto first appeared in the social security administration database in 1929. Its highest recorded popularity was in 1990 when it reached rank #513. As of 2010, it ranked #893.
| Year | Rank | Gender | % of Total Gender |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 893 | Male | 0.0113% |
| 2009 | 903 | Male | 0.0109% |
| 2008 | 813 | Male | 0.0124% |
| 2007 | 770 | Male | 0.0129% |
| 2006 | 702 | Male | 0.0143% |
| 2005 | 688 | Male | 0.0142% |
| 2004 | 683 | Male | 0.0139% |
| 2003 | 625 | Male | 0.0156% |
| 2002 | 594 | Male | 0.0169% |
| 2001 | 565 | Male | 0.0178% |
| 2000 | 575 | Male | 0.0169% |
| 1999 | 556 | Male | 0.0177% |
| 1998 | 576 | Male | 0.0167% |
| 1997 | 530 | Male | 0.0188% |
| 1996 | 542 | Male | 0.0177% |
| 1995 | 530 | Male | 0.0181% |
| 1994 | 537 | Male | 0.0177% |
| 1993 | 522 | Male | 0.0184% |
| 1992 | 520 | Male | 0.0182% |
| 1991 | 521 | Male | 0.0174% |
| 1990 | 513 | Male | 0.0173% |
| 1989 | 583 | Male | 0.0134% |
| 1988 | 561 | Male | 0.0136% |
| 1987 | 533 | Male | 0.0148% |
| 1986 | 559 | Male | 0.0132% |
| 1985 | 571 | Male | 0.0124% |
| 1984 | 561 | Male | 0.0124% |
| 1983 | 583 | Male | 0.0113% |
| 1982 | 558 | Male | 0.0126% |
| 1981 | 579 | Male | 0.0117% |
| 1980 | 517 | Male | 0.0146% |
| 1979 | 591 | Male | 0.0117% |
| 1978 | 596 | Male | 0.0115% |
| 1977 | 570 | Male | 0.0127% |
| 1976 | 583 | Male | 0.0121% |
| 1975 | 579 | Male | 0.0120% |
| 1974 | 574 | Male | 0.0120% |
| 1973 | 582 | Male | 0.0115% |
| 1972 | 658 | Male | 0.0089% |
| 1971 | 663 | Male | 0.0085% |
| 1970 | 651 | Male | 0.0083% |
| 1969 | 677 | Male | 0.0074% |
| 1968 | 647 | Male | 0.0077% |
| 1967 | 699 | Male | 0.0064% |
| 1966 | 680 | Male | 0.0066% |
| 1965 | 705 | Male | 0.0059% |
| 1964 | 694 | Male | 0.0061% |
| 1963 | 726 | Male | 0.0056% |
| 1962 | 721 | Male | 0.0054% |
| 1961 | 703 | Male | 0.0055% |
| 1960 | 700 | Male | 0.0058% |
| 1959 | 683 | Male | 0.0058% |
| 1958 | 705 | Male | 0.0053% |
| 1957 | 668 | Male | 0.0060% |
| 1956 | 778 | Male | 0.0042% |
| 1955 | 694 | Male | 0.0054% |
| 1954 | 894 | Male | 0.0033% |
| 1953 | 722 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1952 | 726 | Male | 0.0048% |
| 1951 | 751 | Male | 0.0045% |
| 1950 | 747 | Male | 0.0047% |
| 1949 | 750 | Male | 0.0047% |
| 1948 | 758 | Male | 0.0045% |
| 1947 | 668 | Male | 0.0058% |
| 1946 | 740 | Male | 0.0048% |
| 1945 | 801 | Male | 0.0044% |
| 1944 | 693 | Male | 0.0058% |
| 1942 | 779 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1940 | 920 | Male | 0.0040% |
| 1939 | 821 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1938 | 781 | Male | 0.0055% |
| 1936 | 931 | Male | 0.0041% |
| 1934 | 945 | Male | 0.0042% |
| 1933 | 942 | Male | 0.0044% |
| 1932 | 905 | Male | 0.0047% |
| 1931 | 806 | Male | 0.0057% |
| 1930 | 901 | Male | 0.0049% |
| 1929 | 841 | Male | 0.0055% |
Search Baby Names
Today's Poll
Loading...
