Clayton

Origin Gender Meaning
Australian Boy Suburb name
Old English Boy The Clay Farm
Brazilian Boy Clay town

 

Fun Facts about the name Clayton

Backwards
Notyalc
Scrabble Score
12 points
Similar & Rhyming Names

 

Popularity of Clayton

Popularity Analysis

The name Clayton first appeared in the social security administration database in 1880. Its highest recorded popularity was in 1988 when it reached rank #146. As of 2024, it ranked #317.


Year Rank Gender % of Total Gender
2024 317 Male 0.0586%
2023 310 Male 0.0580%
2022 286 Male 0.0639%
2021 279 Male 0.0659%
2020 288 Male 0.0635%
2019 274 Male 0.0678%
2018 253 Male 0.0746%
2017 250 Male 0.0753%
2016 266 Male 0.0679%
2015 248 Male 0.0723%
2014 271 Male 0.0663%
2013 258 Male 0.0685%
2012 261 Male 0.0674%
2011 258 Male 0.0662%
2010 252 Male 0.0660%
2009 273 Male 0.0595%
2008 234 Male 0.0723%
2007 247 Male 0.0653%
2006 225 Male 0.0728%
2005 216 Male 0.0782%
2004 198 Male 0.0909%
2003 182 Male 0.1014%
2002 178 Male 0.1046%
2001 162 Male 0.1138%
2000 151 Male 0.1229%
1999 157 Male 0.1150%
1998 150 Male 0.1118%
1997 147 Male 0.1162%
1996 149 Male 0.1168%
1995 151 Male 0.1173%
1994 149 Male 0.1163%
1993 158 Male 0.0984%
1992 167 Male 0.0910%
1991 172 Male 0.0871%
1990 153 Male 0.0944%
1989 154 Male 0.0936%
1988 146 Male 0.0945%
1987 153 Male 0.0930%
1986 161 Male 0.0868%
1985 157 Male 0.0895%
1984 150 Male 0.0968%
1983 158 Male 0.0927%
1982 161 Male 0.0906%
1981 185 Male 0.0723%
1980 193 Male 0.0688%
1979 199 Male 0.0676%
1978 203 Male 0.0634%
1977 197 Male 0.0683%
1976 186 Male 0.0730%
1975 193 Male 0.0726%
1974 203 Male 0.0670%
1973 199 Male 0.0687%
1972 230 Male 0.0556%
1971 239 Male 0.0532%
1970 264 Male 0.0437%
1969 262 Male 0.0435%
1968 264 Male 0.0426%
1967 266 Male 0.0419%
1966 260 Male 0.0427%
1965 249 Male 0.0466%
1964 251 Male 0.0460%
1963 234 Male 0.0494%
1962 250 Male 0.0463%
1961 231 Male 0.0538%
1960 221 Male 0.0576%
1959 238 Male 0.0521%
1958 232 Male 0.0523%
1957 242 Male 0.0464%
1956 234 Male 0.0450%
1955 234 Male 0.0441%
1954 239 Male 0.0407%
1953 230 Male 0.0435%
1952 227 Male 0.0438%
1951 231 Male 0.0427%
1950 243 Male 0.0414%
1949 236 Male 0.0416%
1948 238 Male 0.0405%
1947 225 Male 0.0436%
1946 221 Male 0.0455%
1945 216 Male 0.0466%
1944 212 Male 0.0474%
1943 206 Male 0.0527%
1942 213 Male 0.0497%
1941 206 Male 0.0528%
1940 211 Male 0.0509%
1939 197 Male 0.0558%
1938 200 Male 0.0564%
1937 188 Male 0.0638%
1936 186 Male 0.0662%
1935 186 Male 0.0658%
1934 183 Male 0.0675%
1933 187 Male 0.0646%
1932 175 Male 0.0731%
1931 168 Male 0.0778%
1930 178 Male 0.0709%
1929 166 Male 0.0773%
1928 174 Male 0.0729%
1927 163 Male 0.0791%
1926 161 Male 0.0834%
1925 162 Male 0.0809%
1924 154 Male 0.0888%
1923 157 Male 0.0874%
1922 160 Male 0.0868%
1921 158 Male 0.0837%
1920 153 Male 0.0873%
1919 149 Male 0.0888%
1918 156 Male 0.0838%
1917 167 Male 0.0789%
1916 159 Male 0.0816%
1915 165 Male 0.0793%
1914 158 Male 0.0824%
1913 181 Male 0.0711%
1912 169 Male 0.0766%
1911 165 Male 0.0841%
1910 178 Male 0.0763%
1909 176 Male 0.0769%
1908 170 Male 0.0811%
1907 192 Male 0.0681%
1906 180 Male 0.0694%
1905 174 Male 0.0768%
1904 188 Male 0.0693%
1903 189 Male 0.0657%
1902 175 Male 0.0731%
1901 198 Male 0.0623%
1900 176 Male 0.0727%
1899 214 Male 0.0529%
1898 180 Male 0.0659%
1897 196 Male 0.0615%
1896 161 Male 0.0790%
1895 183 Male 0.0679%
1894 212 Male 0.0504%
1893 187 Male 0.0644%
1892 228 Male 0.0449%
1891 194 Male 0.0586%
1890 176 Male 0.0643%
1889 176 Male 0.0638%
1888 221 Male 0.0485%
1887 173 Male 0.0677%
1886 182 Male 0.0613%
1885 192 Male 0.0586%
1884 193 Male 0.0562%
1883 199 Male 0.0516%
1882 210 Male 0.0492%
1881 212 Male 0.0480%
1880 201 Male 0.0507%